Free Online Legal Resources
When a claimant contends that a medical care provider failed to supply adequate information to obtain informed consent, the claimant must prove that the treatment was rendered in other than an emergency situation and that the medical care provider did not supply that type of information as would customarily have been given to a patient by other medical care providers with similar training and experience at the time of the treatment. In determining whether the plaintiff has satisfied these requirements, the following matters shall also be considered: (1) whether a person of ordinary intelligence and awareness in a similar position could reasonably be expected to know of the risks or hazards inherent in such treatment; (2) whether the patient knew of the risks or hazard inherent in such treatment; (3) whether the injured party would have undergone the treatment regardless of the risk involved or whether he did not wish to be informed thereof; and (4) whether it was reasonable for the medical care provider to limit disclosure of information because such disclosure could be expected to adversely and substantially affect the injured person`s condition.
This article is intended to be helpful and informative. But even common legal matters can become complex and stressful. A qualified medical malpractice lawyer can address your particular legal needs, explain the law, and represent you in court. Take the first step now and contact a local medical malpractice attorney to discuss your specific legal situation.