<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Free District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs | Free  District of Columbia Medical Malpractice Legal Documents</title>
    <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/index.html</link>
    <description>LawInfo - Legal Resource Center offers free District of Columbia Medical Malpractice legal forms and free District of Columbia Medical Malpractice legal documents that is designed to help consumers and businesses resolve their legal issues</description>
    <item>
      <title>Can Arbitration Be Used In Medical Malpractice Cases?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/can-arbitration-be-used-in-medical-malpractic.html</link>
      <description>D.C. has established a system of arbitration where all cases are eligible. The arbitrator's award may be entered in court and has the same force and effect as a final judgment. Subsequent to arbitration, every party is still afforded the right to a civil trial and evidence admitted at trial cannot be identified as being mentioned that it was used during the arbitration process.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attorneys' Fees</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/attorneys-fees.html</link>
      <description>D.C. does not place a statutory cap on the fees an attorney may recover in a medical malpractice action.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What About The Collateral Source Rule?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/what-about-the-collateral-source-rule.html</link>
      <description>D.C. bars evidence of payment from a collateral source thereby producing such evidence will not reduce the claimant's damages.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What About Contributory Or Comparative Negligence?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/what-about-contributory-or-comparative-neglig.html</link>
      <description>D.C. follows the doctrine of contributory negligence. Thus, a claimant's contributory negligence bars his recovery entirely. Joint tortfeasors who may pay more than their pro rata share have a right of contribution.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Damage Caps</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/damage-caps.html</link>
      <description>D.C. does not place a cap on the amount of damages recoverable in a medical malpractice action.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Expert Testimony Necessary?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/is-expert-testimony-necessary.html</link>
      <description>Expert testimony is generally required in order to establish a breach of the standard of care in medical malpractice actions.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do Governmental Immunities Apply?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/do-governmental-immunities-apply.html</link>
      <description>D.C. owes its medical employees a duty of indemnification in cases in which the District is not a party and the alleged personal injury or death resulted from the employee's negligent performance of his professional responsibilities, but only to the extent the employee is not covered by appropriate insurance.  No action for unliquidated damages for personal injury may be instituted against the District, unless notice of claim is made to the Mayor within six months from the date of injury. In addition, absent extraordinary circumstances, the District is not liable for punitive damages.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What About Joint And Several Liability?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/what-about-joint-and-several-liability.html</link>
      <description>D.C. holds that joint tortfeasors are jointly and severally liable for a claimant's compensatory damages, and damages cannot be allocated.  Liability for punitive damages is several, and is apportioned by relative fault.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does D.C. Have Patient Compensation Funds Or Physician Insurance?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/does-d-c-have-patient-compensation-funds-or-p.html</link>
      <description>D.C. does not have a patient compensation fund or a program of state&amp;shy;sponsored liability insurance for physicians.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are Periodic Payments Required?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/are-periodic-payments-required.html</link>
      <description>The District of Columbia does not require the periodic payment of damages in medical malpractice actions.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Pre-Judgment Interest Available?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/is-pre-judgment-interest-available.html</link>
      <description>It is unclear whether pre&amp;shy;judgment interest is available in personal injury actions. However, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals has held that pre&amp;shy;judgment interest may be awarded for conversion, an action in tort involving property.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Statutes Of Limitations?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/what-is-the-statutes-of-limitations.html</link>
      <description>The statute of limitations that applies to medical malpractice actions in the District of Columbia is a three&amp;shy;year statute.  The statute is measured from the time plaintiff knows or with the exercise of due diligence should know of the injury.  Claimants who are either under the age of eighteen, mentally incompetent, or imprisoned may bring their action within three years following the removal of their disability.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arbitration</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/arbitration.html</link>
      <description>D.C. has established a system of arbitration where all cases are eligible. The arbitrator's award may be entered in court and has the same force and effect as a final judgment.  Subsequent to arbitration, every party is still afforded the right to a civil trial and evidence admitted at trial cannot be identified as being mentioned that it was used during the arbitration process.</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is A Hospital Liable For Vicarious Liability?</title>
      <link>http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Medical-Malpractice/District-of-Columbia/is-a-hospital-liable-for-vicarious-liability.html</link>
      <description>&lt;SPAN style="FONT&amp;shy;SIZE: 10pt; FONT&amp;shy;FAMILY: Verdana; mso&amp;shy;fareast&amp;shy;font&amp;shy;family: 'Times New Roman'; mso&amp;shy;bidi&amp;shy;font&amp;shy;family: Arial; mso&amp;shy;ansi&amp;shy;language: EN&amp;shy;US; mso&amp;shy;fareast&amp;shy;language: EN&amp;shy;US; mso&amp;shy;bidi&amp;shy;language: AR&amp;shy;SA"&gt;A hospital may be liable under the theory of ostensible or apparent agency for the negligence of the hospital's independently contracted physicians. &lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
      <category>District of Columbia Medical Malpractice FAQs</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>