How Could O.J. Be Found Not Guilty In His Criminal Case, Yet, Liable In His Civil Case?
As discussed above, the burden of proof in a criminal matter is different than in a civil matter. To be found guilty in a criminal proceeding, the state must show beyond a reasonable doubt that you are guilty of the crime charged. Beyond a reasonable doubt is a difficult burden to meet. In a civil case the plaintiff must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is responsible for any damages. Numerically, a preponderance of the evidence is a showing of a 51% certainty that the defendant is responsible. Beyond a reasonable doubt requires a showing of guilt closer to 100%. This explains why some people are found “not guilty” in a criminal case then found “liable” in a civil case that is based upon the same underlying facts.
Other Civil Versus Criminal Law FAQs
Criminal Law Sub-categories
