Why Can Topamax Victims Sue Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Or Johnson & Johnson?
Under a theory of product liability, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen or Johnson & Johnsonhad a duty to warn consumers of known dangers or harmful side-effects that may result after taking a drug. In this case, it is alleged that Ortho-McNeil-Janssen or Johnson & Johnsonknew of the potential risk of birth defects after taking Topamaxe, but failed to warn of these dangers. Drug consumers are owed this duty in order for them to make informed decisions regarding whether to take a prescribed medication
Speak to an Experienced Topamax Attorney Today
This article is intended to be helpful and informative. But even common legal matters can become complex and stressful. A qualified topamax lawyer can address your particular legal needs, explain the law, and represent you in court. Take the first step now and contact a local topamax attorney to discuss your specific legal situation.
Additional Topamax Articles
- What Is Topamax?
- What are the Topamax side effects?
- What is a Cleft Palate?
- What Are Some Topamax Secondary Effects?
- Have doctors prescribed Topamax for weight loss?
- Why did the Government file a Topamax lawsuit?
- Is Topamax Still Available?
- What Is The Generic Drug For Accutane?
- What Kinds Of Topamax Dosing Are there?
- Why Was There An FDA Warning Of Topamax?
- What Is The Increased Risk Of Oral Clefts In Pregnant Women Who Took Topamax?
- Has there been a Topamax recall?