Why Can Topamax Victims Sue Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Or Johnson & Johnson?
Under a theory of product liability, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen or Johnson & Johnsonhad a duty to warn consumers of known dangers or harmful side-effects that may result after taking a drug. In this case, it is alleged that Ortho-McNeil-Janssen or Johnson & Johnsonknew of the potential risk of birth defects after taking Topamaxe, but failed to warn of these dangers. Drug consumers are owed this duty in order for them to make informed decisions regarding whether to take a prescribed medication
The information on this page is meant to provide a general overview of the law. The laws in your state and/or city may deviate significantly from those described here. If you have specific questions related to your situation you should speak with a local attorney.
Additional Topamax Articles
- What Is Topamax?
- What are the Topamax side effects?
- What is a Cleft Palate?
- What Are Some Topamax Secondary Effects?
- Have doctors prescribed Topamax for weight loss?
- Why did the Government file a Topamax lawsuit?
- Is Topamax Still Available?
- What Is The Generic Drug For Accutane?
- What Kinds Of Topamax Dosing Are there?
- Why Was There An FDA Warning Of Topamax?
- What Is The Increased Risk Of Oral Clefts In Pregnant Women Who Took Topamax?
- Has there been a Topamax recall?